Bad Faith Registrations belong to a category of intellectual property registration, particularly trademark, where an individual or an entity registers a trademark or domain name deliberately with a dishonest intention. The purpose of such kind of registration is to typically use, pursue or develop the Intellectual Property with an intention to exploit or harm other businesses to gain financial gain and a competitive edge.
I. What is the impact of bad faith applications?
Bad faith registration against a well-known intellectual property creates hinderance on the part of the business causing financial loss. Legitimate businesses have to face increased costs to recover their rights through legal proceedings or buybacks. Misusing intellectual property through the means of bad faith registration often damage the brand’s reputation and consumer trust. These kind of bad faith practices ruins fair competition and affects proper functioning of the market. The main characteristics of bad faith registrations are dishonest intent of the applicant, absence of genuine use of the mark and conflicting with the rights of the original owner of the business.
Unethical registration of trade mark which is similar to that of the established brands forces business to engage themselves in costly legal disputes. Australian businesses, who are seeking to expand their business globally may face challenges which might block their business in the domestic market or even globally. The businesses and companies maybe forced to purchase their own trade mark from bad faith registrants to secure their own rights and ensure no duplicity exists in the market. When a bad faith registration ruins a trade mark’s reputation, businesses may need to extensively invest in rebranding it and control the damage caused. One such impact of bad faith registration in the society is it diverts the customers attention and mislead them impacting the original brand’s loyalty and trust. Startups and small businesses often face the issue of bad faith registration and their lack of resources fail to combat such malpractices. The presence of bad faith registrations disrupts the natural market affecting the prices, innovation and consumer choice.
II. Legal Analysis of “Bad Faith” Registrations
In 1995, Australia has established a comprehensive legal framework known as the Trade Mark Act, 1995 for the purpose of registration, protection and enforcement of trade marks to protect the rights of the owners of intellectual property to promote business practices in the marketplace. Section- 62A of the Trade Mark Act, 1995 (Cth) allows a trademark to be opposed or removed on the ground that it was filed under “bad faith”. There exists no precise definition of the term “bad faith” but this section interprets dishonest intention of the applicant. Similarly, Section- 42 of the Trade Mark Act, 1995 (Cth) states that a trade mark application can be rejected when it is found out to be I contrary to the law. In this aspect, the term “in contrary to the law” refers to violation of laws in respect of bad faith registrations. A trade mark can also be challenged under Section- 60 of the Trade Mark Act, 1995 (Cth) when it is found to be identical or deceptively similar to an established mark while harming the reputation of business and causing confusion among the public incurring significant losses. Apart from Australia’s domestic laws, there exists an international policy known as the Union Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy established by Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for the purpose of resolving disputes related to domain name registrations to combat trade mark infringement or cybersquatting.
Australia does not participate directly in Union Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy but has its own independent adaptation such as au Dispute Resolution Policy (auDRP) which was established on 14th April, 2016. The auDRP manages the Australian domain name system and provides a mechanism for resolving disputes related to domain name licenses by offering a cost-effective and faster alternative to litigation. This policy addresses bad faith domain name registrations under the Australian Domain Name Administrator. This policy also simultaneously resolves disputes when a domain name is registered to exploit an existing business and their rights. In the case of Hard Coffee Pty Ltd v Hard Coffee Main Beach Pty Ltd FCA 489, the Federal Court of Australia addressed a dispute over a coffee shop name where the Court ruled in favor of Hard Coffee Pty Ltd who is the opponent by granting an injunction to prevent Hard Coffee Main Beach Pty Ltd, the applicant, from using the name “Hardcoffee” and “Hardcoffee Main Beach”. The registrant of the “Hardcoffee” trademark was accused of bad faith for blocking a competitor’s use of a similar name. This example demonstrates the Court ruling where it emphasized the importance of intention and competitive harm in determining bad faith.
III. Enforcement and Remedies:
Australia’s regulatory and legal interventions provide multiple avenues for opposition, dispute resolution and enforcement. However, continuity in the measures plays an important role to further deter unethical practices and ensure the protection of intellectual property rights. This regulates fair competition in the market. Let’s see how these enforcement and remedies can be carried forward.
Opposition Proceedings:
This allows the third parties to challenge a trademark application even prior to its registration. When a trademark application is advertised, a third party can file an opposition under Section-52 of the Trade Mark Act, 1995 (Cth). The notice of opposition must be filed within 2 months from the date the trademark application is advertised in the Australian Official Journal of Trade Marks.
Litigation and Appeals:
The right holders when the opposition proceedings become unsuccessful can pursue legal action through the intervention of the Courts. Trademark holders can initiate a case to revoke a registered trademark or can seek damages for infringement caused due to “bad faith registration”. The Court evaluates the matter and conducts examination including the applicant’s intention and actions and ca thereby revoke the registration of the trademark and awards damages to compensate the financial losses by the legitimate owners.
Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR):
ADR mechanisms are applied particularly for disputes involving domain names like the au Dispute Resolution Policy. Under this policy, a legitimate right holder can make an application and submit a complaint to the body. The purpose is to focus on whether the domain name registered was in bad faith to exploit the legitimate owner. If claims are successful then it would lead to transfer or cancellation of domain name without the intervention of lengthy litigation.
IV. Conclusion
Bad faith registration poses a significant threat to the legitimate owners by undermining their intellectual property rights and damaging their brand reputation. This increases financial burden as they suffer losses. Registration of bad faith trademarks mislead the consumers and likewise, disrupts fair competition in the market. The Trademark Act, 1995 (Cth) plays a vital role in dealing with such unethical issues. The amendment of the act in 2006 for addition of Section- 62A let the legitimate owners oppose such bad faith marks. Furthermore, it is essential to create awareness among the small businesses and startups for protecting their own intellectual property to mitigate the impact of bad faith registrations. A commitment to address bad faith registration is essential for maintaining a balanced and competitive market environment.
Contact us
Contact us to learn more about how LexGeneris can assist you with all your intellectual property needs. You can also schedule a no-cost consultation with our team of expert IP Attorneys Australia, IP Attorneys India, and IP Attorneys New Zealand.
Together, we can safeguard and enhance the value of your innovations. Our dedicated team of Patent Attorney Australia, and Trademark Attorney Australia specialists can provide expert guidance and support, helping you navigate the complexities of intellectual property law in Australia, New Zealand, India, and beyond.
